![]() |
![]() |
|
WASHINGTON NEWS NOVEMBER 6, 2002 ELECTION EFFECT AND LAME-DUCK OUTLOOK How the shift to Republican majorities in both the House and Senate will affect issues relating to science, engineering and technology remains unclear as Congress heads into a lame-duck session. The most popular early guess is that new “continuing resolutions” will be passed to keep the government operating at fiscal year 2002 levels until sometime in late January or February, with action on FY2003 appropriations bills postponed for action by the new Congress. Republicans will take over committee chairmanships in the Senate and new members will have to be assimilated in both houses, so the SET community will be working hard to educate Senators, Representatives and their staffs on the importance of federal investment in R&D and education. Because of party seniority and other rules, few surprises are expected in SET leadership positions. One defeated member who will be missed, however, is Rep. Connie Morella (R-MD), called by her colleagues “the angel of NIST” and a strong and reliable supporter of SET legislation for many years. NSF DOUBLING HITS SNAG In
a case of the best-laid plans gone astray, legislation to double the authorized
funding for the National Science Foundation was quietly laid aside as Congress
adjourned its regular session. As
reported earlier, the House and Senate each passed similar legislation putting
NSF on the path to a doubled budget over the next five fiscal years. For several weeks, staff members from the
House Science Committee, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
Committee and the Senate Commerce Committee worked out differences between the
two bills and readied the compromise for what was supposed to be quiet passage
under “unanimous consent” by both houses.
At the last minute, however, a “hold” was placed on the bill by Senator
Jon Kyl (R-AZ) at the behest of the Office of Management and
Budget. OMB reportedly objects to the use of the word “doubling” in the title of the legislation, and more fundamentally objects to an authorization that extends over five years (this despite the Administration’s support of the five-year doubling mandate for the National Institutes of Health, begun under the Clinton Administration). Staffers also cite objections to the bill’s “Tech Talent” provisions and language granting the National Science Board more independence from NSF. Staffers continue to try to work out these hurdles so action can be taken in the lame-duck session in December. Otherwise, the authorization process will have to start over again in the new Congress.
NEW LAW FOCUSES ON MANUFACTURING PROCESSES On Election Day, President Bush signed into law the Enterprise Integration Act, authorizing the National Institute of Standards and Technology to work with manufacturing industries to support the development of standards for information exchange and use these standards to ensure the seamless flow of information up and down the supply chain. NIST is directed to involve its laboratories, the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, and the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Program, and consortia that include government and industry in the process. For each major U.S. manufacturing industry, NIST is to work with industry, trade associations and professional societies to identify all enterprise standardization and implementation activities underway, and to assist in the development of roadmaps (to be based on voluntary consensus standards) to permit supply chains to operate as an integrated electronic enterprise. Technical and financial support would be provided to small and medium-sized businesses that set up enterprise integration pilot projects. NSF TEACHING LEADERSHIP CENTERS The
National Science Foundation has announced its investment in five new Centers for
Learning and Teaching to increase the numbers, professionalism and diversity of
K-12 math and science teachers, and higher education faculty who prepare future
teachers. The new centers – at the
American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington University in
St. Louis, and the Universities of Wisconsin, Washington, and Georgia – will
receive an estimated $10 million each over the next five years. Individual efforts in the K-12 component
of the program range from development of new math and science curricula, to
instructional materials and professional development of teachers. The higher-education component will
provide for coordinated efforts in research, faculty professional development
and education practice at colleges and universities. More information is available at http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/esie/programs/clt/clt.asp NEW FEDERAL R&D REPORT The
long-awaited analysis of federal investment in R&D prepared for the
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has been released by
the RAND Science and Technology Policy Institute. The analysis, “Federal Investment in
R&D,” does not make policy recommendations but rather is a distillation of
statistics from the National Science Foundation, the American Association for
the Advancement of Science, and other sources. It underscores, in the words of PCAST
member Erich Bloch, the fact that “A review of the lat 25 years of $&D
funding shows the rather large changes in the areas supported. There are not only changes between
defense and civilian R&D caused by changes in the international political
climate, but also rather large shifts in funding among science and engineering
disciplines, such as the physical and life sciences.” In his introduction to the report, Bloch
identifies declining or stagnant human resources in science and engineering as
the “paramount” issue for PCAST.
The full report is at http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1639.0/ Contact Us | FMS News | Conference | What is FMS Search this Site | Useful Links | Calendar | What are Materials © 2002 Federation of Materials Societies
|